Statement and Conclusions Questions and Answers

According to the statement, 90% of the team consist of permanent staff. So, I does not follow. Nothing about the best work is mentioned in the statement. So, II also does not follow.

Clearly from the statement Ronak is the only son of their parents. This means that he has obviously no brothers. So the direct conclusion is I.

Clearly from the statement Neelam has secured more than 60% in both 10^th and 12^th. However; her graduation percentage is not above 60%. So, she will not be shortlisted.

Here we can clearly see that the conclusion I can be directly derived from the given statement but nothing can be particularly said about the II conclusion.

Nothing has been told about the attention to details in the given statement. Hence it is not valid as per given statement. However, conclusion II is an indirect conclusion that can be referred from the statement.

Clearly from the above we can conclude that either of the two conclusions can happen but not both. Either Rashmi will work hard and she will do an overtime, or else she will be not. So option C is correct.

Here both the conclusions are irrelevant with respect to the given statement. Hence neither of the conclusions are valid.

Both the conclusions are already taken from the statement only hence option E is correct.

Here the 1st conclusion is the indirect explanation of the given statement. Hence conclusion I is valid. Conclusion II is not valid as per given information.

Infringement should not be there in anyone’s personal life is the clear implication of statement. While conclusion ii is not valid as we have no information about that.

From the given statement, it cannot be conferred clearly whether people of India and other nations will support the decision or not. Hence option D is correct.

Rudra has been called for the seminar means that he is clever and intellectual. Hence both the conclusions are valid.

The statement mentions that the mangoes are of different types, some are good while some are not. Thus, both I and II follow.

In the statement, we can see that total runs made by team India is not very good. So, either batting of Team India was poor or the bowling of Team Pakistan was very good. So, either I or II follows.

Conclusion I and II both are contrary with the statements. Hence option C is correct.

Both the statements are not valid as the company is using catchy slogan because for attracting the people. So conclusion I is not valid. Also we cannot judge people preference. So conclusion II also does not follow.

Hence only II conclusion is valid as it talks about the advantage of taking a younger captain

option A is not valid as instant banking service is a good service which every bank should adopt. However option B is valid as it is in line with the statement itself.

Both the conclusions I and II are the best possible logical outcome of the information given above in the given statement. Hence option E is correct.

Pakistan matter is different which may or may not be discussed, however combined military exercise shows strong connection between two nations military. Hence option A is correct.

To keep a safety one should be precautious, but we cannot say anything about the preference of the people, hence option A is correct.

Conclusion I seem logical but conclusion II doesn’t.

According to the statement, conclusion I seems correct as the reduced distance between two places will be helpful for people.

The director might have embarrassed Savant not because of his hatred but on account of certain carelessness or fault on his part. So, I does not follow. Also, nothing about savant relation to his co-worker is mentioned. Hence option D is correct.

According to the statement, National steel organization has moved India from a position of shortage in the past to self-sufficiency in the present. By this it is clear that, India had to import steel. So, I follows. Also, India can soon export it in future. So, II also follows.

The statement talks of Dumb canes only and not about all plants so, I does not follow. Also, since Dumb canes require little water, so they can be grown in places where water is not in a huge quantity. So, II follows.

Clearly, I directly follows from the statement.

Clearly, the information has been given beforehand so that the residents can collect water on the previous day and use less water on Friday. So, both I and II follow.

Clearly both the statements doesn’t follows as we cannot say anything about nature of someone and relation between speaking and health.

Neither the poor nor the rich, but only the role of money in education is being talked about in the statement. So, neither I nor II follows.