Time:
00:
00:
00Statement: Should there be a dress code for the employees in the office?
Arguments:
I. Yes, why not?
II. No, dress code makes life monotonous.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
PrepInsta Explanation
User Explanation
Once you attempt the question then PrepInsta explanation will be displayed.
Explanation:
I is not strong as there is no argument.
II is simplistic. II is not strong.
Neither I nor II is strong.
Please login to submit your explanation
Login to see your performance analytics by signing in
Time:
00:
00:
00Statement: Are these sanctuaries, which are meant to protect the endangered animals, necessary?
Arguments:
I. Yes, these are necessary as it is our responsibility to conserve environment and to provide posterity with a better world to live in.
II. No, these are a huge burden on our receding economy.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if both I and II are strong.
if both I and II are strong.
PrepInsta Explanation
User Explanation
Once you attempt the question then PrepInsta explanation will be displayed.
Explanation: While both arguments have valid points, the argument for the necessity of sanctuaries (Argument I) is stronger due to the importance of environmental conservation and our responsibility to future generations. Protecting endangered animals and preserving biodiversity have long-term benefits that go beyond immediate economic considerations. Additionally, sustainable conservation efforts can also have positive economic impacts, such as promoting ecotourism and generating revenue from nature-based activities.
Please login to submit your explanation
Login to see your performance analytics by signing in
Time:
00:
00:
00Statement: Should the institute conduct classes in remote villages?
Arguments:
I. Yes, this will help those students who belong to villages and cannot visit urban ares for studies.
II. No, this is not an economically viable proposal, as the number of students who attend such classes cannot
contribute to break-even.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
If both I and II are strong.
If both I and II are strong.
PrepInsta Explanation
User Explanation
Once you attempt the question then PrepInsta explanation will be displayed.
Explanation:
Statement I: The basic purpose of conducting classes is to help students. Hence, statement I is a strong argument as it conveys this idea.
Statement II: If the institute conducts classes with the intention of making profits, then this is a valid point to be considered. Hence, statement II is also strong.
Please login to submit your explanation
Login to see your performance analytics by signing in
Time:
00:
00:
00Statement: Should the parents send their children to English medium schools?
Arguments:
I. Yes, other parents are doing so.
II. Yes, children will be able to learn English.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
PrepInsta Explanation
User Explanation
Once you attempt the question then PrepInsta explanation will be displayed.
Explanation: I is not strong argument as it is comparative.
II is not strong as it is based on the assumption that in the non-English medium schools students will not be able to learn English.
Neither I nor II is strong.
Please login to submit your explanation
Login to see your performance analytics by signing in
Time:
00:
00:
00Statement: Should government improve the drainage system in the city?
Arguments:
I. Yes, the existing drainage system was built to eater to 500 households while the number of households increased to 1000.
II. No, there is no improvement in the infrastructure in the city.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
PrepInsta Explanation
User Explanation
Once you attempt the question then PrepInsta explanation will be displayed.
Explanation: I is strong because it states that the existing drainage system will not be sufficient to cater to demand.
II is irrelevant as it is referring to the infrastructure of the city.
Only I is strong.
Please login to submit your explanation
Login to see your performance analytics by signing in
Time:
00:
00:
00Statement: Are there any good politicians left in this world?
Arguments:
I. Yes, so many poor people are sustaining themselves and improving economically.
II. No, there is nothing in this world which is completely good or completely bad.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
PrepInsta Explanation
User Explanation
Once you attempt the question then PrepInsta explanation will be displayed.
Explanation: Just because some poor people are improving economically, we cannot conclude that there are good politicians. Any reason could be ascribed to such an improvement. Statement II is very vague and is not giving any reasons for the argument that it proposes. Hence, both the statements are weak arguments.
Please login to submit your explanation
Login to see your performance analytics by signing in
Time:
00:
00:
00Statement: Should there be a law to punish parents who get their minor children married?
Arguments:
I. Yes, a minor girl is physiologically not prepared to conceive a baby.
II. No, this has been a custom prevailing since many centuries.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong
if neither I nor II is strong
PrepInsta Explanation
User Explanation
Once you attempt the question then PrepInsta explanation will be displayed.
Explanation: Statement I explains a valid reason to go against such marriages because it is wrong to encourage anything that jeopardises the health of a person. Hence, (I) is a strong argument.
Statement II is not a valid argument because a custom being followed since a long time does not necessary make it good. Only I is strong.
Please login to submit your explanation
Login to see your performance analytics by signing in
Time:
00:
00:
00Statement: Should we switch to a green fuel (fuel extracted from food grains)?
Arguments:
I. Yes, it does not pollute the environment.
II. No, it will increase the prices of food products.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
PrepInsta Explanation
User Explanation
Once you attempt the question then PrepInsta explanation will be displayed.
Explanation: I is based on a positive result and desirable.
Hence I is strong.
II is not strong because there can be separate production for this purpose.
Only I is strong.
Please login to submit your explanation
Login to see your performance analytics by signing in
Time:
00:
00:
00Statement: Should students pursue higher education?
Arguments:
I. Yes, they would be able to earn more money.
II. No, there is no need as such.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
PrepInsta Explanation
User Explanation
Once you attempt the question then PrepInsta explanation will be displayed.
Explanation: Earning more money is desirable positive result. Hence I is strong. II is simple, and no substantial reason is given, hence II is not a strong argument.
Only I is strong.
Please login to submit your explanation
Login to see your performance analytics by signing in
Time:
00:
00:
00Statement: Should the teachers be stopped from beating the students?
Arguments:
I. Yes, child psychologies say that beating hinders the learning process in a child.
II. No, spare the cane and spoil the child.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument I is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if either I or II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong.
PrepInsta Explanation
User Explanation
Once you attempt the question then PrepInsta explanation will be displayed.
Explanation: Anything which hinders the learning process in a child must be controlled and, if possible, be prohibited. The aim of teacher should be to make a child learn. According to argument I, beating causes hindrance to learning process of a child thus defeating the ultimate goal. If also supports its argument by referring to the findings of psychologists. Hence, I is a strong argument. Argument II states that a child will be spoiled if it is not caned. Caning is an extreme measure, there are also other softer methods to rectify a child. Moreover, the argument is not substantiated by any facts. Hence, II is a weak argument.
Please login to submit your explanation
Login to see your performance analytics by signing in
["0","40","60","80","100"]
["Need more practice!","Keep trying!","Not bad!","Good work!","Perfect!"]
Apply For Jobs
Get Hiring Updates
