Wipro Inferred meaning Quiz -1

Solution:

The answer to the above question is option 2 and this can be drawn on the basis of the line “But science isn't supposed to care about preconceived notions. Science, at least good science, tells us about the world as it is and not as some wish it to be".
Option 1 is wrong as there is no relevant point in the passage to draw this conclusion.
Option 3 is too farfetched and it may not be always true for science and religion to be the same.
Option 4 is wrong as there is no fact in the passage to support this option.

The paragraph has one simple outcome: in a social environment, an individual cannot act, think or feel without considering others. This simple fact is illustrated by option 3. Option 4 commits the mistake of using the word retrospectively (In a manner contemplative of past events). Option 1 commits the mistake of only quoting the actions of others, and option 2 brings in ‘motivations’, something which is not mentioned in the paragraph.

In the given case, option 4 is the only valid inference. We know tryptophan helps produce serotonin, which in turn helps cure depression in some cases. This connection is highlighted by option 4.
Option 1 is something we cannot conclude. We are not sure whether not consuming tryptophan causes depression. Option 2 is again ruled out as the paragraph does not state that producing enough serotonin precludes depression.
Option 3 is incorrect as serotonin is not directly metabolized in the body and this means that having foods containing serotonin cannot be synthesized by the body directly.

In this case, we are told that there is no reliable relationship between the median income and average level of education for the middle class and the increase/decrease in income levels does not have an impact on education levels. This sentiment is highlighted by option 3.
Options 1 and 4 can be ruled out as no direct co-relation can be found between the median income and average level of education for the middle class. These two options in fact give a particular extreme co-relation.
Option 2 is irrelevant in the given case (goes against the given facts, figures for comparison have been derived in fact).

[A] There’s no mention of the geologists keeping this event a secret, so we can eliminate A.
[B] The Yucatan wasn’t discovered as being the location until later in the passage, meaning it wasn’t well-known, so we can eliminate B.
[D] Climate isn’t named as a factor in the discovery, so answer choice D can also be eliminated.
[C] Choice C is the best choice, as we see from our notes under the main ideas, the collision occurred in 1980 and geologists didn’t locate the area until 1990.

For 1: Here the commuters called on the strike in a response to the accidents which take place due to overcrowding and are demanding increase in the frequency of trains, assuming that if the frequency increases, then lesser number of such accident would take place. Hence, 1 is an assumption.
For 2: As the number of accidents is increasing in the past one year, it can be inferred that, the frequency of trains did not increase in accordance to the increase in the number of commuters. Hence, 2 is an inference.
For 3: In the statement, there is no reference to intention of the railway authority. Hence, 3 is out of context.
For 4: From the statement an increase in the number of overcrowding it can be concluded that, the trains in the Mumbai suburban run overcrowded. Hence, 4 is a conclusion.

The Mumbai couple approached the court because the courts have the authority to sanction euthanasia. Hence, the inference is definitely true.

Answer:

The person is waiting for a reply from the University. The paragraph carries a negative sense and it makes it clear that the person was checking his computer for mail. But it doesn’t make it clear that he has received a rejection letter, in which case he is still waiting for a reply to come.

None of the courses of action follow. All of them contain a lot of extraneous information and are impractical solutions.

Answer:

The person’s beliefs are dangerous to others.