WeCP Statement and Conclusion Quiz 1

Solution:

In the statement, we can see that the total runs made by the losing team RCB is 130 before losing all the wickets. So, either the batting of Team RCB was poor or the bowling of Team DD was very good. So, either I or II follows.

Solution:

Here, the proportionality is linear. So if one increases, other also increases and vice versa.

Solution:

The statement mentions that the grapes in the world are of different types, some are good while some are not. Thus, both I and II follow.

Solution:

From the first statement, It implies that Anushka serves well and gets paid well too.

From second statement, it implies that other employees get good payment in exchange of their work

but it doesn't imply that Anushka is self employed.

Solution:

We cannot conclude that all the countrymen of a particular country are lazy, because this cannot be possible. Hence conclusion II does not follow.

Since self-dependency means that a country is able to produce all that they need. As the statement says In today's era, it is hard for a country to achieve self-dependency, we can safely conclude it is hard for a country to grow and produce all that it needs. Hence, the conclusion I follow.

Solution:

Conclusion I is false as there are other professions too which are unethical but media is the most unethical.

Conclusion II is true as media people are misleading others.

Solution:

In statement I, It is given that ‘Knowledge is not a skill’. Thus knowledge and skill are two different things. This conclusion follows

In statement II it is given that those who cannot learn are illiterate, but it is not mentioned as those who cannot read and write are literate or illiterate. So this conclusion does not follow.

Solution:

Following the two conclusions, we can infer that the value of z is already provided in conclusion II.

Value of y can be found out from z and following that, the value of x can also be found out.

Solution:

Shagun = 3.5 metres

Ahana = 3*3.5 = 10.5 metres

Anu, Kabir > Sonia > Ahana

We cannot obtain any conclusion from here.

Solution:

In conclusion I, without discipline must be the source of the disturbance. Hence, it follows.

In conclusion II, There is no given statement in the argument about all the people in the society that points or establishes this fact. Thus, this conclusion does not follow.

Hence, only I follow