Reliance Jio Statement and Conclusion Quiz- 1

Clearly from the above we can conclude that either of the two conclusions can happen but not both. Either Pranjal will work hard and he will do overtime, or else he will not.

Here the 1st conclusion is the indirect explanation of the given statement. Hence conclusion I is valid. Conclusion II is not valid as per given information

Clearly, I directly follow from the statement.

The director might have embarrassed Tathgat not because of his hatred but on account of certain carelessness or fault on his part. So, I do not follow. Also, nothing about savant relation to his co-worker is mentioned.

only II conclusion is valid as it talks about the advantage of taking a younger captain.

From the given statement, it cannot be conferred clearly whether people of India and other nations will support the decision or not.

The father punished his son in this instance, but no specific explanation was offered. It can be because his son neglected to finish his schoolwork or arrived home late. Therefore, it would be incorrect to assume that the father punished his kid because he disapproved of him. So, stay away from such judgments.

Regarding the offered statement's attention to detail, nothing has been stated. Therefore, it cannot be true given the assertion. Conclusion II, on the other hand, can be inferred indirectly from the statement.

The phrase (i) didn’t follow because it just refers to Alovera and not to all plants. Alovera can be grown in areas with limited water availability because of their low water requirement. II then follows.

Clearly both the statements don't follow as we cannot say anything about the nature of someone and relation between speaking and nature.