First Naukri Syllogism Quiz 1

Answer:
Analytical Method:
E + E = No conclusion
Thus, neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.

Answer:
Analytical Method:
All appreciation are trophies (A) + All trophies are certificates (A) = A + A = A = All appreciation are certificates.
Hence, conclusion I follows.
But, conclusion II does not follow.

Answer:
Analytical Method:
All shrubs are saplings + Some saplings are herbs = A + I = No conclusion.
Hence, neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.
However, since they make a complementary pair I - O,
Therefore, either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.

Answer:
Analytical Method:
All mugs are jar (A) + [No tumbler is a jar (E)] = No jar is a tumbler (E) = A + E = E = No mug is a tumbler.
Hence, conclusion I follows.
Again ,
All mugs are jar (A) = Some jar are mugs (I). It means,
At least some jar are mugs.
Hence conclusion II follows.
Thus, both conclusion I and II follow.

Answer:
All orifices are lunette (A) + All lunette are portal (A) + [No fence is a portal (E)] = No portal is a fence (E) = A + E = E = No orifice is a fence.
Hence, conclusion II follows .
Again,
All lunettes are portal (A) + [No fence is a portal (E)] = No portal is a fence (E) = A + E = E = No lunette is a fence.
Thus, conclusion I do not follow.

Answer:
Analytical Method:
Statements:
All logos are cars.
All cars are engine.

Using S1 and S2, we get - 'All logos are engine'. Clearly, C1 doesn't follow.
From S2, we get the converse as 'Some engine are cars' which implies that 'Some cars are engine'. Therefore, C2 doesn't follow either.
Hence, neither C1 nor C2 follows.

Answer:
Analytical Method:
All tracks are verses (A) + All verses are tunes (A) = A + A = A = All tracks are tunes.
From the above given conclusion and statement III, we get first conclusion:
All tracks are tunes (A) + No tune is a clause (E) = A + E = E = No track is a clause.
From the given statement II and III, we get second conclusion:
All verses are tunes (A) + No tune is a clause (E) = A + E = E = No verse is a clause.
Hence, both the conclusion I & II follows.

Answer:
Analytical Method:
'No slip is a diary' gives us an inference that 'Some diaries are not slips' for sure. Therefore, C2 follows.
Similarly, from 'All diaries are manuals' it is evident that 'Some diaries are definitely manuals'. Clearly, C1 follows as well.

Answer:
Analytical Method:
There is no negative statement. Hence, the conclusion I follows.
All containers are guides (A) + Some guides are cartons (I)
From both the statements it's evident that they are not properly aligned and the middle term 'guides' is not being distributed in either of the statements. Therefore conclusion II doesn't follow

Answer:
Analytical Method:
No clavier is a clue (E) + All clues are discs (A) = E + A = O* = Some discs are not claviers. Hence, the conclusion I follow.
Again, Some rodents are claviers (I) + No clavier is a clue (E) = I + E = O = Some rodents are not clues. Thus, the possibility in II does not exist. Hence, conclusion II does not follow.