Wiley Edge Syllogism Quiz-4

1. All apples are fruits.Apples ⊆ Fruits


2. All fruits are healthy. Fruits ⊆ Healthy


3. No healthy food is sugary.Healthy ∩ Sugary = Ø


4. Some sugary foods are desserts. Sugary ∩ Desserts ≠ Ø

Conclusion I: There is no direct connection or intersection provided between the sets of bands and cars. Conclusion I does not follow.
Conclusion II: Since every weight is a steel (from statement 2) and few steels are coppers (from statement 3), there is no direct connection or intersection provided between the sets of weights and bands. Conclusion II does not follow.
Conclusion III: there is no direct connection or intersection provided between the sets of coppers and cars.Conclusion III does not follow.
Conclusion IV: there is no direct connection or intersection provided between the sets of steels and cars. Conclusion IV does not follow.
Based on the analysis, none of the given conclusions follow from the given statements.

1. All mountains are hills. Mountains ⊆ Hills
2. All hills are landscapes.Hills ⊆ Landscapes
3. No landscape is a desert.Landscapes ∩ Deserts = Ø

Conclusion I: Based on statement 1 and 3, we can conclude that no shrub can be a flower. This follows directly from the given statements.
Conclusion II:There is no direct information or relationship given between plants and flowers. Hence, we cannot conclude that some plants are not flowers.

Conclusion I: we know that some birds can swim and all flying creatures have wings. But there is no information about birds flying so we cannot conclude that some birds have wings.
Conclusion II: we know that no fish can fly. However, there is no direct information about whether fish can swim or not. so it is not possible to conclude that some fish can swim.

Conclusion I: From statements 1 and 2 it is evident that some pens are pencils and all pencils are erasers so in turn there are some pens that are erasers. Therefore, the conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II: we know that no eraser is a marker and all pencils are erasers. Therefore, it is possible that there are markers that are not pens. Hence, Conclusion II follows.

Conclusion I: we know that some animals are cats and all dogs are animals. but, there is no relation specified between cats and dogs so ,conclusion I does not follow.
Conclusion II: we know that no cat is a bird, but some animals are cats. Therefore, it is not possible to conclude that some birds are animals. Hence, Conclusion II does not follow.

Conclusion I: we know that some students are athletes and all athletes are tall. Therefore, it is possible that some students are tall. Hence, Conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II: we know that no tall person is short. However, there is no direct information about the relationship between students and short people. Therefore, we cannot conclude that no student is short. Conclusion II does not follow.

Conclusion I: there is no direct relationship established between plants and birds. Therefore, we cannot conclude that some plants are birds. Conclusion I does not follow.
Conclusion II: it is stated that no tree is a bird, but there is no direct information about the relationship between flowers and birds. Therefore, we cannot conclude that no flower is a bird. Conclusion II does not follow.
Conclusion III: there is no direct relationship established between animals and flowers. Therefore, we cannot conclude that some animals are flowers. Conclusion III does not follow.

Conclusion I: we know that some fruits are apples, and all apples are red. Therefore, it is true that some fruits are red. Conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II:There is no direct information given about the relationship between fruits and green. The given statements only mention the relationship between red and green. Therefore, we cannot conclude that no fruit is green. Conclusion II does not follow.
Conclusion III: we know that all apples are red, and no red is green. Therefore, it is true that some apples are not green. Conclusion III follows.