Robert Bosch Objective Reasoning Quiz 3

Ans: Only Conclusion I follows
Explanation:
The statement states that every student who studied diligently passed the exam. Let's evaluate the conclusions:

I. John studied diligently, so he passed the exam: This conclusion is valid and follows from the statement. It directly aligns with the condition mentioned that diligent studying leads to passing the exam. Therefore, Conclusion I follows.
II. Mary passed the exam, so she must have studied diligently: This conclusion is not valid as it assumes a one-to-one relationship between passing the exam and studying diligently. The statement does not state that studying diligently is the only path to passing the exam. Other factors or methods of preparation could also lead to success. Hence, Conclusion II does not follow.

Ans: Only conclusion 1 follow
Explanation:
The statement states that all triangles have three sides. Let's evaluate the conclusions:
I. Squares have four sides: This conclusion is valid as squares are known to have four sides. It does not contradict the statement. Therefore, Conclusion I follows.
II. A circle has three sides: This conclusion is not valid as it contradicts well-known facts about circles. Circles do not have straight sides; they are continuous curves. Hence, Conclusion II does not follow.

Ans: Both I or II follows
Explanation:
The statement states that all birds can fly. Let's evaluate the conclusions:
I. Penguins are birds: This conclusion is valid. Penguins fall under the category of birds. Therefore, Conclusion I follows.
II. Penguins cannot fly: This conclusion is also valid.

Answer: Neither I nor II follows
Explanation:
According to the statement, 80% of the total runs were made by fast bowlers. So, I does not follow. Nothing about the opening batsmen is mentioned in the statement. So, II also does not follow.

Ans: Only conclusion I follows
Explanation:
The statement states that all metals conduct electricity. Let's evaluate the conclusions:

I. Gold is a metal, so it must conduct electricity: This conclusion is valid. Gold is classified as a metal, and the statement explicitly mentions that all metals conduct electricity. Therefore, Conclusion I follows.
II. Wood is also a metal and can conduct electricity: This conclusion is not valid. It contradicts the well-known fact that wood is not a metal and is, in fact, an insulator. The statement only pertains to metals, not other materials. Hence, Conclusion II does not follow.

Answer: Only assumption I is implicit
Explanation:
Since the statement talks of putting the child, Taimur in school at the age of 5, it means that the child is mentally prepared for the same at this age. So, I is implicit. But nothing about admission after 6 years of age is mentioned in the statement. So, II is not implicit.

Explanation:
I directly follow from the statement and so is implicit. Also, the statement is a suggestion and does not tell about a government policy or its position of funds. So, II is not implicit.

Explanation:
The statement mentions that if the people ask about the tailor, your suit is good. This means that people ask only in the situation when the thing is good. So, I is implicit. The criteria of an excellent suit is not mentioned. So, II is not implicit.

Ans: Both assumptions I and II are implicit.
Explanation: Both assumptions I and II are implicit. Assumption I is implicit as it suggests that the performance of an individual is generally not known at the time of appointment offer. Assumption II is implicit as it states that generally, an individual tries to prove their worth during the probation period.

Ans: Both assumptions I and II are implicit.
Explanation: Both assumptions I and II are implicit. Assumption I is implicit as it suggests that people are generally interested in improving their health and well-being. Assumption II is implicit as it acknowledges that regular exercise requires commitment and effort.