Wipro WILP Written Communication Test 2023

April 27, 2023

Wipro WILP Written Communication Test

Work Integrated Learning Program is platform provided by Wipro for BSC and BCA students.
On this page we will discuss about Wipro WILP Written Communication Test 2023. Which is an essay writing assessment.

Wipro Wilp Written Communication Test

Wipro WILP Written Communication Test 2023 For Freshers

Essay Writing Wipro WILP
Time 20 minutes
Number of Questions 1 Question
Difficulty High

Points to be remembered while  Wipro WILP Written Communication Test

  • First think the body of your essay i.e. how you are going to write your essay.
  • A well Structured or well order essay with meaningful section always apply a positive impact on the reader.
  • Using facts to support your points so that no one can den
  • Structure of the essay should be in order so that each section express a meaning which support your view regarding that topic.
  • Conclude the topic by summarizing your facts.

Understanding the Topic-

The first thing you should understand is weather the topic need your view or opinion . Now the difference between giving your view and opinion is

  1. About View
  2. About Opinion

Prime Course Trailer

Related Banners

Wipro WILP Written Communication Test 2023

  • If you want to score good in Wipro Written Communication Test then you need to prepare in advance as no one can learn and  write a well structured essay overnight.
  • First start reading good articles from which you can learn the structure for your essay practice as well as it will also help you in improving your vocabulary.
  • Start practising with easier topics like Environment, School life, Internet etc. and try to write in well structured manner.
  • Let someone else check your essay. Don’t check on yourself let someone else judge you this time and that person should be biased.

Steps for Wipro WILP Written Communication Test 2023

Given below some steps this will help you in preparing well for your Wipro WILP Written Communication Test

Wipro Wilp Written Communication Steps

Step-1

Understanding the Topic
First thing you need to understand the topic. Few points you should consider while thinking and understanding about your Essay writing topics.

Key words
  • First you need to understand the Topic and its Concept. And then look for the key words in the topic.
  • If you are familiar with the  topic then it will become easy for you to know about the Key Words.
  • Now you need to decide that where you have to use the Keyword because repetitive use of Key Word shows negative impact.
Contradicting
  • Make sure you use each sentence in a clear way do not overlap your sentence.
  • Once you are starting a new statement you have to be clear that you are contradicting your own point while discussing another point.
  • Make sure that your point is not giving any negative idea or irrelevant point.
Examples
  • Try to give more and more relevant examples which is familiar to people. You can give example either from newspaper or famous article.

Wipro Wilp Written Communication Steps

STEP -2

Arrangement
  • Divide your essay body in 3-4 sub-body parts and use every body part carefully and distinctively.
Presentation
  • Represent your essay in a very well manner. Each Sub part consists of a clear and positive message.
Pro's
  • Elaborate the positive points of your essay with the help of maximum examples.
Cons
  • Every topic contains pros and cons but don't highlight the cons too much in your essay Put the cons in such a way that you are suggesting methods to make it good.
Summarize
  • Summarize your thoughts by concluding the topic. And conclude in such a manner that no one can oppose your conclusion.

Wipro Wilp Written Communication Steps

STEP -3

Write
  • Keep all those points in your mind while writing the essay.
Idea
  • Make sure that in each sub part you are explaining a different thing. In first part try to explain about the topic.
Support
  • From the next sub part involve more points supporting your idea. Also the information should be relevant.
Opposite
  • Also mention the cons of topic with suggesting ideas.
Conclude
  • Conclude your essay in this way that the whole essay infer what you tried to make other understand and reader do not left with any contradiction.

Wipro Wilp Written Communication Steps

STEP -4

Points to be Checked
  • Did you convey a meaningful lesson from the essay?
  • The whole passage revolve around the topic and Key Word
  • Summarize the essay in a positive manner.
  • Did you mentioned the topic in the introduction paragraph to introduce the base of passage?
  • Be sure that you mention both positive and negative points of essay.
  • Provide more and more relevant examples
  • Do your examples support your ideas?
  • Did you use correct grammar, spelling, and language, for the most part?

Sample Essay

Feminism: The Women’s Movement

To make an omelette you need not only those broken eggs but someone “oppressed” to break them: every revolutionist is presumed to under stand that, and also every woman, which either does or does not make 51 per cent of the population of the United States a potentially revolu tionary class. The creation of this revolutionary class was from the vir tual beginning the “idea” of the women’s movement, and the ten dency for popular discussion of the movement still to center around day care centers is yet another instance of that studied resistance to the pos sibility of political ideas which char acterizes national life.

“The new feminism is not just the revival of a serious political move ment for social equality,” the femin ist theorist Shulamith Firestone an nounced flatly in 1970. “It is the sec ond wave of the most important revolution in history.” This was scarcely a statement of purpose any one could find cryptic, and it was scarcely the only statement of its kind in the literature of the move ment. Nonetheless, in 1972, in a “special issue” on women, Time was still musing genially that the move ment might well succeed in bringing about “fewer diapers and more Dante.”

Joan Didion is author of “Play It As It Lays,” “Slouching Towards Bethlehem” and “Run River.”

That was a very pretty image, the idle ladies sitting in the gazebo and murmuring lasciate ogni speranza, but it depended entirely upon the popular view of the movement as some kind of collective inchoate yearning for “fulfillment” or “self expression,” a yearning absolutely devoid of ideas and therefore of any but the most pro forma benevolent interest. In fact there was an idea, and the idea was Marxist, and it was precisely to the extent that there was this Marxist idea that the curious historical anomaly known as the women’s movement would have seemed to have any interest at all.

Marxism in this country had ever been an eccentric and quixotic pas sion. One oppressed class after an other had seemed finally to miss the point. The have‐nots, it turned out, aspired mainly to having. The minori ties seemed to promise more, but finally disappointed: it devloped that they actually cared about the issues, that they tended to see the integra tion of the luncheonette and the seat in the front of the bus as real goals, and only rarely as ploys, counters in a larger game. They resisted that es sential inductive leap from the im mediate reform to the social ideal, and, just as disappointingly, they failed to perceive their common cause with other minorities, con tinued to exhibit a self‐interest disconcerting in the extreme to organ izers steeped in the rhetoric of “brotherhood.”

Politics

Understanding the term politics may be more complicated than it may first appear. To be more specific the right answer for the definition of politics can vary due to the fact that the term can be defined in several conflicting ways. On one hand, some people define politics as a greedy battle for power while some believe that politics is a way by which one individual takes in the hankering of his own community into achievement. Regardless of the two opposing views several authors have managed to define politics on a common ground. For example Peter Joyce defines politics as ”the study of the behaviour of individuals within a group context” (Joyce 2010: 1), similarly a definition of politics was given by Andrew Heywood in which he explains politics ”as the activity through which people make, preserve and amend the general rules under which they live” ( Heywood 1997: 4). Therefore because there isn’t a single definition of politics the purpose of this essay is to use political concepts to further elaborate the term politics and give the reader a better understanding. The following concepts which will be used to better your understanding of the term politics in this essay are: power, conflict, consensus and art of government.

To begin with the several political concepts mentioned above for the better understanding of the term politics we shall first of all look into politics in form of power.

POLITICS AS POWER: Power in a political analysis is usually ”thought of as a relationship which is the ability to influence the behaviour of others in a manner not of their choosing” (Heywood 2000: 35). As given example by Andrew Heywood he explains that power only appears when one person makes another individual to do anything they might not have interest into(Heywood 2000: 35).

Likewise from Peter Joyce point of view he sees politics in the form of power to be more of a ”relationship between two parties in which one has the ability to compel the other to undertake a course of action involuntarily” (Joyce 2000:7).

The nature of power is an important matter when it comes to politics, due to that we shall Identity the three different dimensions or faces of power, which are power as decision making, power as agenda setting and power as thought control.

Power as decision making: This type of dimension of power consists of a certain plan that may alter the content of decisions (Heywood 1997: 11). This approach is comparable to the idea of mechanical or physical power. This indicates that power involves the pushed or pulled against ones intention. Influencing decision itself has been categorized into three ways by Keith Boulding where there is the ” use of force or intimidation (the stick), productive exchange involving mutual gain (the deal) and lastly the loyalty and commitment (the kiss)” (Heywood 2000: 36).

Power as agenda setting: Secondly is the dimension of power which was advocated by Bachrach and Baratz in the year 1962. These faces of power possess the skill to deny any decision from being made. (Heywood 2000: 36)

Power as thought control: lastly but not the least of all dimensions of power, is the face of power which is used to influence the wants and need of individuals. This face of power is important due to the fact that it highlights the impact of ideology (Heywood 2000: 36).

Talking more on the concepts of politics, this essay will now move on to politics as consensus.

POLITICS AS CONSENSUS: The term consensus itself means general agreement and when it comes to politics as consensus it is more towards the way in which decisions are made. As said by Andrew Heywood ”politics is seen as a particular means of resolving conflict” (Heywood 2007: 9). What this author is basically saying is that in politics we have to agree to disagree on both terms instead of enforcing power. This concept of politics is implied when politics is portrayed as ”the art of the possible” similarly an interesting definition of politics which relates to this concept of politics was given by Bernard Crick in which he says ”Politics is the activity by which differing interest within a given unit rule are conciliated by giving them a share in power in proportion to their importance to the welfare and the survival of the whole community” (Crick 2000: 21), well from the above point of view given by Crick he says that the key to politics is therefore a wide dispersal of power. Crick further elaborates his definition by adding that politics can also be portrayed as ” that solution to the problem of order which chooses conciliation rather than violence and coercion” (Crick 2000: 30). A view towards his explanation shows more of a belief that society is characterized by consensus rather than irreconcilable conflict