Splitting data into Training and Testing sets
Splitting data into Training and Testing sets for machine learning
In machine learning and data analytics, splitting data into training and testing sets is a crucial step that plays a significant role in building a model’s performance and ensuring its generalizability to real-world data.
In this article, we’ll explore the importance of splitting data, the methods used, and the considerations for selecting appropriate training and testing datasets. By the end of this guide, you’ll have a clear understanding of how and why to split data effectively in machine learning.
Splitting the Data Sets
Why Splitting Data into Training and Testing Sets?
1. Preventing Overfitting
- When a model is trained on the entire dataset, it might memorize the data (overfitting) rather than learning the underlying patterns.
- This results in a model that performs well on the training data but fails to generalize to new, unseen data.
- By using a separate testing set, we can evaluate how well the model generalizes to new examples.
2. Model Evaluation
- A testing set provides a way to evaluate a model’s accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and other performance metrics.
- This helps in assessing how well the model is likely to perform in real world situations, ensuring it is not overly optimized for a specific set of data.
3. Simulating Real World Scenarios
- In the real world, a machine learning model is exposed to data it hasn’t seen before.
- By splitting the data, we create a scenario where the model is trained on one portion and tested on another, closely mimicking how the model will be used in actual applications.
Data Splitting Process
The overall dataset is typically divided into two main subsets:
- Training Set: This portion of the data is used to train the machine learning model. The model learns patterns, correlations, and insights from this data.
- Testing Set: After training, the model is tested on this data. It helps evaluate the model’s performance by comparing the predicted outcomes against actual results.
In some cases, there may also be a third subset: - Validation Set: This set is used during the training process to tune model hyperparameters, preventing overfitting or underfitting. It is not strictly required in every model but is useful when fine-tuning a model’s architecture.
Common Ratios for Splitting
- Standard practice is to allocate around 70-80% of the data for training and 20-30% for testing.
- However, these proportions can vary depending on the size of the dataset and the complexity of the model.
Here are some common splits:
- 70% Training, 30% Testing
- 80% Training, 20% Testing
- 60% Training, 40% Testing (used for smaller datasets)
In case of very large datasets, the test set can be a smaller percentage, such as 10%, since even a small sample of a large dataset can provide a reliable evaluation.
Random Splitting vs. Stratified Splitting
1. Random Split:
- This method divides the data randomly into training and testing sets.
- It’s suitable when the data is evenly distributed and does not have any class imbalance.
2. Stratified Split:
- For datasets with imbalanced classes (i.e., where one class has significantly more samples than another), stratified sampling ensures that each class is represented proportionally in both the training and testing sets.
- This technique is essential to avoid bias in the model’s evaluation.
Differences Between Training, Testing and Validation Data
| Aspects | Training Sets | Testing Sets | Validation Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Used to train the mode. | Used to evaluate the model’s performance on unseen data | Used to tune model hyper parameters and assess performance during training |
| Data Usage | Model learns patterns and relationships from this set. | Model predictions are compared to actual results to assess accuracy | Helps in adjusting the model’s settings without influencing training directly |
| Data Proportion | 70-80% of the total data.(commonly) | 20-30% of the total data (commonly) | Typically 10-20% of the total data if used |
| Examples | Holdout, K-Fold Cross-Validatio. | Holdout, K-Fold Cross-Validation | K-Fold Cross-Validation, Early Stopping |
| Key Consideration | Ensures that the model has enough data to learn pattern. | Used to simulate how the model performs on real-world, unseen data | Helps in fine-tuning model hyper parameters, ensuring better generalization |
| Overfitting Risk | Low if the training data is diverse enough. | Moderate if the model is too simple or over fitted to the training data | Low as the validation set does not overlap with the training data |
| Impact on Model Evaluation | Direct impact on how well the model learns and fits to data. | Direct impact on how the model generalizes to new data | Indirect impact, but helps refine and prevent over fitting |
Methods for Splitting Data
There are several ways to split data into training and testing sets in machine learning:
1. Holdout Method
- This is the most straightforward method, where the dataset is split into two sets (training and testing).
- The model is trained on the training set and then evaluated on the test set.
- While simple, this method can be problematic when the dataset is small because the model may not have enough data to learn from or may not be adequately tested.
2. K-Fold Cross-Validation
- In this method, the dataset is divided into ‘k’ equally sized folds (subsets).
- The model is trained on ‘k-1’ folds and tested on the remaining fold.
- This process is repeated k times, with each fold used once as the test set.
- The results from each fold are averaged to produce a final evaluation score.
- K-fold cross-validation helps in reducing the variance associated with a single train-test split. It is particularly useful for small datasets and provides a better estimate of a model’s performance.
3. Leave One Out Cross Validation (LOOCV)
- LOOCV is an extreme form of k-fold cross-validation where k equals the number of data points.
- For each iteration, the model is trained on all but one sample and tested on that one sample.
- This method is computationally expensive and typically used when datasets are very small, ensuring every data point is used for both training and testing.
4. Time Series Split
- For time series data, where the order of data points matters, random splitting isn’t suitable.
- Instead, time-based splitting is used. The training set consists of the earlier time points, while the testing set consists of later time points.
- This ensures that the model is tested on data that comes after the training data, preserving the temporal aspect.
Challenges and Considerations When Splitting Data
1. Data Leakage
- Data leakage occurs when information from outside the training set is used to create the model.
- This can happen if there is an overlap of information between the training and testing sets.
- To avoid data leakage, it’s crucial to ensure that the splitting is done in such a way that no information from the test set influences the training process.
2. Imbalanced Data
- In datasets with imbalanced classes, some classes may be underrepresented in both the training and testing sets, leading to biased model performance.
- Stratified splitting, as mentioned earlier, helps mitigate this issue by ensuring that the distribution of classes in both sets reflects the overall distribution in the dataset.
3. Small Datasets
- When datasets are small, splitting them into training and testing sets can be tricky because each data point is valuable for both training and testing.
- In such cases, using techniques like k-fold cross-validation or leave-one-out cross-validation can help make better use of limited data.
4. Model Complexity and Data Size
- For large datasets, the model might perform well with only a small portion of the data, meaning you can afford to allocate a smaller testing set.
- However, for smaller datasets, even a small reduction in data can significantly affect performance, so you might want to reserve a larger portion for testing or use cross-validation.
Best Practices for Splitting Data
1. Ensure randomization:
For most datasets, randomly shuffling the data before splitting ensures that the training and testing sets are representative of the entire dataset.
2. Preserve class distribution:
Use stratified sampling for imbalanced datasets to ensure that each class is represented proportionally in both the training and testing sets.
3. Use cross validation:
Whenever possible, use k-fold or leave-one-out cross-validation, especially for smaller datasets, to get more reliable estimates of model performance.
4. Consider time series data:
For time-dependent data, always use time-based splitting to avoid future information leaking into the model.
5. Monitor performance:
Continually assess how well the model performs on both the training and testing data to catch any overfitting or underfitting early.
Conclusion
Splitting data into training and testing sets is a foundational practice in machine learning and data analytics.
By doing so, we ensure that our models are robust, generalizable, and ready to perform well in real-world scenarios.
The method you choose to split the data depends on the nature of the dataset, the model being used, and the specific problem at hand.
Always consider the potential for overfitting, class imbalances, and data leakage when splitting your data.
By following best practices, such as randomization, stratification, and cross-validation, you’ll build more reliable and effective machine learning models that stand the test of time.
Conclusion
If you want to learn more About Machine Learning, AI and Data Analytics Concepts then checkout our PrepInsta Prime Courses.
