Question 1
Both I and II are sufficient
II alone is sufficient while I alone is not sufficient
Either I or II is sufficient
Neither I nor II is sufficient
Good Job!
Oops!
Text solution: From both I and II, we find that Rahul is (35 - 25) = 10 years older than his brother, who was born in 1964. So, Rahul was born in 1954. Video solution:
Please login to submit your explanation
You can check your performance of this question after Login/Signup
Start
Question 2
I alone is sufficient while II alone is not sufficient
Text solution: From I, we conclude that weight of each pole = (4x5) kg = 20 kg. So, total weight of 10 poles = (20 x 10) kg = 200 kg. From II, we conclude that: Weight of each pole = (weight of 3 poles) - (weight of 2 poles) = 20 kg. So, total weight of 10 pojes = (20 x 10) kg = 200 kg. So we can conclude either I or II is sufficient Video solution:
Question 3
None of these
Text solution: From I, we conclude that H is the only daughter of M. But this does not indicate that M has no son. The information given in II is immaterial. Video solution:
Question 4
Text solution: From I, total sale of product A = Rs. (8000 x 25) = Rs. 200000. From II, we know that the company deals only in product A. This implies that sale of product A is the total sale of the company, which is Rs. 200000. Video solution:
Question 5
Only one follows
Text solution: From I, we conclude that 5th, 12th, 19th and 26th of March, 2006 were Sundays. So, the last Sunday fell on 26th. From II, we conclude that 31st March, 2006 was Friday. Thus, 26th March, 2006 was the last Sunday of the month. Video solution:
Question 6
The only word common to I and II is 'clear' and as such, only the code for 'clear' can be ascertained from the given information.
Question 7
Text solution: From I, we know that L is T s brother and J s husband. Since L is the only son of his parents, T is L s sister. From II, we know that K is L s daughter. Thus, from I and II, we conclude that T is the sister of K s father i.e. T is K s aunt. Video solution:
Question 8
From II, we know that P's mother is married to J's husband, which means that J is P's mother.
Question 9
Only second follows
From I, we conclude that Y is the child of D who is wife of X i.e. X is Y's father. From II, X is married to Y's father. This implies that X is Y's mother.
Question 10
I alone is sufficient while II alone is not sufficien
From I, we conclude that Sulekha is the wife of Nandini's mother's only son i.e. Nandini's brother. Thus, Sulekha is Nandini's sister-in-law. From II, we conclude that Sulekha is the cousin of Nandini's husband, which implies that Sulekha is Nandini's sister-in-law.
Please login to report
Login/Signup
Personalized Analytics only Availble for Logged in users
Analytics below shows your performance in various Mocks on PrepInsta
Your average Analytics for this Quiz
Rank
-
Percentile
0%
Completed
0/0
Accuracy
July 30, 2019